Public response to Channel 4s 'Last Chance Kids'
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 2:34 pm
I have had a number of phone calls from parents seeking advice and support following the television series on Channel 4 'Lost for Words' (or 'Last Chance Kids'). I am very pleased to hear from these parents.
I am so pleased that the Dispatches programme is supporting the notion of informing parents about the issues surrounding reading instruction in our schools.
People like Ruth Miskin and myself (and there are many of us but the television series doesn't seem to be making the extent of the reading instruction debate that explicit) - we are steeped in real-life cases of children who have not been taught The Alphabetic Code and the skills of blending and segmenting at all - or not well enough because the teaching is mixed with the guessing-words strategies. We do feel passionately for these children and their parents.
It feels so wonderful to be able to link up with parents who are pretty desperate for help for their children. I just want to provide them with information because armed with information they will be able to help their own children but also know what to look for in terms of what the local schools provide - or not.
I just have to reiterate to any parent who reads this forum, however, that this is NOT about bad teachers - but it is about overloaded and mistrained teachers - and we are in the middle of very big changes in England thanks to the Rose Report.
Be alerted, also, about the popular intervention programmes. If your child is receiving an intervention programme at school based on the 'guessing-words' strategies and the phonics is focused on spelling and not reading - then this is not synthetic phonics teaching.
The Institute of Education's 'Reading Recovery' intervention programme is being promoted by our Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, right now - but he is ill-informed to be promoting RR along with the synthetic phonics teaching principles. This is a contradiction in terms!
The Oxford Brooks University 'Catch Up' programme is another intervention programme that parents need to look out for. You can see a review of this programme and Reading Recovery on the Reading Reform Foundation website in the RRF newsletter no. 60.
Are Gordon Brown and many local authority advisers saying that the strongest schools and strongest pupils should receive reading instruction in line with the Rose Report (synthetic phonics) but that the weakest schools with the weakest pupils should receive teaching with the reading strategies that the Rose Report rejects? This is not a small issue - it is HUGE.
Unfortunately - the reading instruction debate has some way to go....
I am so pleased that the Dispatches programme is supporting the notion of informing parents about the issues surrounding reading instruction in our schools.
People like Ruth Miskin and myself (and there are many of us but the television series doesn't seem to be making the extent of the reading instruction debate that explicit) - we are steeped in real-life cases of children who have not been taught The Alphabetic Code and the skills of blending and segmenting at all - or not well enough because the teaching is mixed with the guessing-words strategies. We do feel passionately for these children and their parents.
It feels so wonderful to be able to link up with parents who are pretty desperate for help for their children. I just want to provide them with information because armed with information they will be able to help their own children but also know what to look for in terms of what the local schools provide - or not.
I just have to reiterate to any parent who reads this forum, however, that this is NOT about bad teachers - but it is about overloaded and mistrained teachers - and we are in the middle of very big changes in England thanks to the Rose Report.
Be alerted, also, about the popular intervention programmes. If your child is receiving an intervention programme at school based on the 'guessing-words' strategies and the phonics is focused on spelling and not reading - then this is not synthetic phonics teaching.
The Institute of Education's 'Reading Recovery' intervention programme is being promoted by our Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, right now - but he is ill-informed to be promoting RR along with the synthetic phonics teaching principles. This is a contradiction in terms!
The Oxford Brooks University 'Catch Up' programme is another intervention programme that parents need to look out for. You can see a review of this programme and Reading Recovery on the Reading Reform Foundation website in the RRF newsletter no. 60.
Are Gordon Brown and many local authority advisers saying that the strongest schools and strongest pupils should receive reading instruction in line with the Rose Report (synthetic phonics) but that the weakest schools with the weakest pupils should receive teaching with the reading strategies that the Rose Report rejects? This is not a small issue - it is HUGE.
Unfortunately - the reading instruction debate has some way to go....