More news of the battle of different teaching methods:

Whether or not you are using the Phonics International Programme, feel free to visit this informal 'Chat' forum!
Here you will find all sorts of interesting articles, links to research and developments - and various interesting topics! Do join in!
Post Reply
User avatar
debbie
Posts: 2596
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: UK

More news of the battle of different teaching methods:

Post by debbie »

http://www.donpotter.net/PDF/Mary%20Joh ... 20Test.pdf

I read this (flagged up on the UK Reading Reform Foundation message forum at www.rrf.org.uk ) - and had to wonder just how many individuals and groups have to keep fighting on and on to bring high-quality, synthetic phonics teaching to the fore. Yet again, note the dates. To this day, my understanding is that synthetic phonics teaching is far from guaranteed in Canada.

Consider that, even now, we are still battling for systematic, synthetic phonics teaching in England itself. Despite the UK government investigating the teaching of reading and subsequently introducing guidance of the synthetic phonics teaching principles for infants in mainstream, nevertheless some of the people with the highest authority in the UK (Prime Minister Gordon Brown and Education Secretary Ed Balls) continue to promote and to fund with taxpayers' money their favoured Reading Recovery programme for 'intervention' purposes.

In effect, the strongest pupils at learning to read should receive synthetic phonics teaching, but the weakest pupils (the ones most in need of synthetic phonics teaching) receive an intensive daily dose of the mixed methods Reading Recovery programme which is the opposite approach to synthetic phonics. The approaches are not compatible.

So, the battle goes on and on - will it always?

Meanwhile, however, the Science and Technology Select Committee in the UK are now questioning the efficacy and lack of objective evidence for the UK government's promotion of Reading Recovery. Hearings are to take place next week with reference to the evidence base for the government's promotion of Reading Recovery.

I hope to attend one of the hearings and will report back. Whilst our Rose Report (2006) is truly historic, what will the outcome be of this forthcoming inquiry into the government's continued mixed messages to its teaching profession? :?

We await with baited breath.
Debbie Hepplewhite
User avatar
debbie
Posts: 2596
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: UK

Evidence Check - Literacy Interventions

Post by debbie »

http://www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_ ... nquiry.cfm

Current inquiry in England - very important indeed!
Debbie Hepplewhite
Post Reply